Research Repository

Eidos and affect: A response to Hook, Sullivan, Dixon and Condor

Baldacchino, Jean-Paul (2011) Eidos and affect: A response to Hook, Sullivan, Dixon and Condor. Ethnicities, 11 (1). pp. 131-135. ISSN 1468-7968

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

My critics point out that I introduce unnecessary conceptual distinctions while failing to draw ones that matter. Both Hook and Sullivan, for example, point out that my article does not differentiate between affect and emotion. Hook also notes that I do not differentiate between the Lacanian registers of the symbolic, the imaginary and the real when discussing identification. He also notes that a number of distinctions I draw are spurious – namely between love and hate and between the Innenwelt and the Umwelt. The substance of the above critique rests almost exclusively on a body of Lacanian and post-Lacanian thought. With Hook, I share a deep respect for the insights offered by Lacanian psychoanalysis. I would, however, like to make a few observations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID25008, Innenwelt, Umwelt, jouissance, neologism, language of emotions, phenomenology, formalism, phenomenological reduction, eidetic reduction, analyst, analysand
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1701 Psychology
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Social Sciences and Psychology
Depositing User: VUIR
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2012 00:06
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2012 00:06
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/10440
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796810388706
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 0 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar