Research Repository

A Socio-technical Approach to Designing and Evaluating Industry Oriented Applications

Miah, Shah Jahan and Gammack, John G and Kerr, Don (2012) A Socio-technical Approach to Designing and Evaluating Industry Oriented Applications. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 15 (2). pp. 163-175. ISSN 1566-6379

[img]
Preview
Text
EJISE Manuscript_Camera Ready_Shah Miah.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (208kB) | Preview

Abstract

Over the past few years many views have emerged that maximize the utilization of design research in Information Systems (IS) application development. A recent insightful debate in the IS community has suggested two major design views in IS research: a) a pragmatic technical artifact orientation, and b) a theory-grounded user and meta-artifact focus. The first (pragmatic design-based) view focuses on explicit knowledge and on a step-by-step methodology for innovative artifact design and building. The second (theory-grounded) view more broadly emphasizes meta-artifact design in IS development and a more prescriptive guidance approach that is grounded in design research. The debate between these two views leads to the question: which method is more suitable for Decision Support System (DSS) design? In extending the debate on design views in IS research, this paper evaluates a DSS application through both the utility of the pragmatic and the socio-technical design research views. This helps create a methodological foundation for industry-oriented DSS design and evaluation. The findings suggest that both positions have merit, but the latter view of design science is more suitable for industry-oriented DSS design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID26302, socio-technical view, design research
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1503 Business and Management
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > College of Business
Depositing User: Yimin Zeng
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2013 23:53
Last Modified: 10 Mar 2015 05:54
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/22156
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar