Research Repository

Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome

Barton, Christian J and Levinger, Pazit and Crossley, Kay M and Webster, Kate E and Menz, Hylton B (2011) Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 4 (1). ISSN 1757-1146 (online)

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

Background Foot posture assessment is commonly undertaken in clinical practice for the evaluation of individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), particularly when considering prescription of foot orthoses. However, the validity of static assessment to provide insight into dynamic function in individuals with PFPS is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the extent to which a static foot posture measurement tool (the Foot Posture Index - FPI) can provide insight into kinematic variables associated with foot pronation during level walking in individuals with PFPS and asymptomatic controls. Methods Twenty-six individuals (5 males, 21 females) with PFPS aged 25.1 ± 4.6 years and 20 control participants (4 males, 16 females) aged 23.4 ± 2.3 years were recruited into the study. Each participant underwent clinical evaluation of the FPI and kinematic analysis of the rearfoot and forefoot during walking using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The association of the FPI score with rearfoot eversion, forefoot dorsiflexion, and forefoot abduction kinematic variables (magnitude, timing of peak and range of motion) were evaluated using partial correlation coefficient statistics with gait velocity entered as a covariate. Results A more pronated foot type as measured by the FPI was associated with greater peak forefoot abduction (r = 0.502, p = 0.013) and earlier peak rearfoot eversion relative to the laboratory (r = -0.440, p = 0.031) in the PFPS group, and greater rearfoot eversion range of motion relative to the laboratory (r = 0.614, p = 0.009) in the control group. Conclusion In both individuals with and without PFPS, there was fair to moderate association between the FPI and some parameters of dynamic foot function. Inconsistent findings between the PFPS and control groups indicate that pathology may play a role in the relationship between static foot posture and dynamic function. The fair association between pronated foot posture as indicated by the FPI and earlier peak rearfoot eversion relative to the laboratory observed exclusively in those with PFPS is consistent with the biomechanical model of PFPS development. However, prospective studies are required to determine whether this relationship is causal.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID26120, foot posture index, patellofemoral pain syndrome, orthopedics, rehabilitation, foot kinematics, walking
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1103 Clinical Sciences
FOR Classification > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL)
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Ms Phung.T Tran
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2014 03:57
Last Modified: 19 Jul 2016 04:30
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/22823
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-10
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar