Research Repository

From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects

Smith, Karl E (2012) From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 23 (1). pp. 50-64. ISSN 1035-8811 (print) 1757-6547 (online)

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

The distinction between understanding persons as dividuals versus individuals began to develop in the latter half of the twentieth century. Originating in Louis Dumont’s comparative work into the differences between Western and Indian subjects in the 1950s, it perhaps reached its zenith in the 1980s when Marilyn Strathern used it to differentiate between Melanesian and Western concepts of the person. By the end of the century, critique and reconceptualisation of the individual:dividual distinction was so well established in the anthropological literature that its explanatory capacity was largely negated. The aim of this paper is to attempt to clarify the different modes of personhood that the dividual:individual distinction sought to elucidate by introducing a useful distinction between the self and the human subject and further developing Charles Taylor’s distinction between porous and buffered selves.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID26203, anthropology, cross-cultural analysis, Indians, Melanesians, Westerners, personhood, dialogical self, porous self, buffered self, selves, individualism, sociocentric
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1601 Anthropology
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > College of Arts
Depositing User: Ms Phung.T Tran
Date Deposited: 18 Jul 2014 01:52
Last Modified: 24 Sep 2014 01:55
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/22863
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00167.x
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 37 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar