Research Repository

Examining reports and policies on cognitive enhancement: approaches, rationale, and recommendations

Outram, Simon M and Racine, Eric (2011) Examining reports and policies on cognitive enhancement: approaches, rationale, and recommendations. Accountability in Research : Policies and Quality Assurance , 18 (5). pp. 323-341. ISSN 0898-9621 (print), 1545-5815 (online)

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

The phenomenon of cognitive enhancement is attracting attention in bioethics literature and beyond, in public policy. In response, three bodies—the British Medical Association (BMA); the Commission de l’éthique de la Science et de la technologie (CEST) du Québec; the American Academy of Neurology (AAN)—have produced reports and guidance on this topic. To gain insights into different public policy approaches, rationales, and recommendations on the topic, we analyzed these reports in depth. We found convergence on the definition (with the exception of the CEST) of cognitive enhancement. However, we noted a lack of critical reflection with respect to the underly- ing rationale for developing these reports, i.e., that cognitive enhancement practices are rampant and represent major social changes. As it currently stands, cognitive enhance- ment is constituted in a way that challenges the creation of coherent and effective policy recommendations. However, policy makers should not simply wait for definitional con- sensus and hope that on balance the benefits turn out to be greater than the risks. Some components of cognitive enhancement could be reduced down to clearly identified policy targets to be further examined. Then, if appropriate, policy should be created that is, amongst other criteria, beneficial to the majority of the population.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biomedical enhancement, enhancement technologies, cognitive enhancement, cognition, health policy, government policies, psychotropic drugs, neuroethics, neuropsychology, bioethics
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1605 Policy and Administration
FOR Classification > 1702 Cognitive Science
FOR Classification > 2201 Applied Ethics
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL)
Depositing User: VUIR
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2013 01:21
Last Modified: 15 Jan 2014 00:55
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/23867
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.606734
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 12 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar