Research Repository

Ta(l)king sides: ethical and methodological challenges in comparative fieldwork on avid football rivalries

Spaaij, Ramon and Geilenkirchen, Matthijs (2011) Ta(l)king sides: ethical and methodological challenges in comparative fieldwork on avid football rivalries. Soccer and Society, 12 (5). pp. 633-651. ISSN 1466-0970 (print) 1743-9590 (online)

[img] Text
Soccer-Society-2011.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (236kB)

Abstract

Previous research on football (soccer) fan cultures has documented the lived experiences of devoted football supporters. Few studies, however, have used participant observation and intensive interviewing to examine the deep-rooted inter-group oppositions that characterize avid football rivalries. Even fewer have done this involving both sides of a rivalry and in countries and cultures unknown or unfamiliar to the researcher. This essay examines the process of doing qualitative research in such settings. Fieldwork experiences in Italy, Spain, England and the Netherlands are used to report and reflect on the ethical and methodological challenges associated with comparative research into inter-group conflicts in the football context. There are specific dilemmas that relate directly to the task of studying multiple sides of a football rivalry. Accusations of partiality and ethical criticisms of the researcher’s betrayal of one side against the other are rife, particularly in situations where intra-group cleavages and a strong distrust of the police exist.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: qualitative research, football supporters, ethical, methodological, cross-cultural
Subjects: Current > FOR Classification > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science
Current > FOR Classification > 2201 Applied Ethics
Current > Division/Research > College of Sports and Exercise Science
Depositing User: Ms Julie Gardner
Date Deposited: 20 May 2014 04:12
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2014 00:32
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/24932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2011.599583
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 7 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar