Research Repository

Development of the Nine-Ball Skills Test to discriminate elite and high-level amateur golfers

Robertson, Samuel ORCID: 0000-0002-8330-0011, Burnett, Angus F, Newton, Robert U and Knight, Peter W (2012) Development of the Nine-Ball Skills Test to discriminate elite and high-level amateur golfers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30 (5). 431 - 437. ISSN 0264-0414

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of appropriate skill assessments available for use in golf. The aim of this study was to examine the discriminative validity and the test–retest reliability of the newly developed “Nine-Ball Skills Test”. Participants of two ability levels (elite, n = 14; high-level amateur, n = 16) each hit nine golf shots of differing combinations of trajectory (straight, fade, draw) and height (normal, high, low) at an individually determined target area. Each shot was scored on its percent error index from the target and whether it achieved the maximum height as required. Participants completed the test twice using a 5-iron club. The elite group scored significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the amateur group for both the first and second rounds of the test as well as the combined scores. The between-round test–retest reliability was deemed to be not acceptable, thus we propose that the test's protocol should include use of the two rounds as standard. Due to the importance of ball striking and flight control to performance in golf, the Nine-Ball Skills Test is appropriate for providing a measure of this skill component in elite and high-level amateur golfers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: golf; performance; professional golfers; testing; skills
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > College of Sports and Exercise Science
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 11 Mar 2015 05:34
Last Modified: 13 Jan 2017 00:51
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/26278
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.654398
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 15 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar