Research Repository

Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity

Heslop, Liza ORCID: 0000-0003-2761-5147, Power, R and Cranwell, K (2014) Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity. Human Resources for Health, 12 (1). 1 - 11. ISSN 1478-4491

[img] Text
12960_2014_Article_447.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (412kB)

Abstract

Background The care coordination workforce includes a range of clinicians who manage care for patients with multiple chronic conditions both within and outside a hospital, in the community, or in a patient’s home. These patients require a multi-skilled approach to support complex care and social support needs as they are typically high users of health, community, and social services. In Australia, workforce structures have not kept pace with this new and emerging workforce. The aim of the study was to develop, map, and analyse workforce functions of a care coordination team. Methods Workflow modelling informed the development of an activity log that was used to collect workflow data in 2013 from care coordinators located within the care coordination service offered by a Local Health Network in Australia. The activity log comprised a detailed classification of care coordination functions based on two major categories – direct and indirect care. Direct care functions were grouped into eight domains. A descriptive quantitative investigation design was used for data analysis. The data was analysed using univariate descriptive statistics with results presented in tables and a figure. Results Care coordinators spent more time (70.9%) on direct care than indirect care (29.1%). Domains of direct care that occupied the most time relative to the 38 direct care functions were ‘Assessment’ (14.1%), ‘Documentation’ (13.9%), ‘Travel time’ (6.3%), and ‘Accepting/discussing referral’ (5.7%). ‘Administration’ formed a large component of indirect care functions (14.8%), followed by ‘Travel’ (12.4%). Sub-analyses of direct care by domains revealed that a group of designated ‘core care coordination functions’ contributed to 40.6% of direct care functions. Conclusions The modelling of care coordination functions and the descriptions of workflow activity support local development of care coordination capacity and workforce capability through extensive practice redesigns.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Care coordination; Chronic disease management; Health care; Health workforce reform; Interprofessional teams; Workflow modelling
Subjects: FOR Classification > 1110 Nursing
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > College of Health and Biomedicine
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 25 Feb 2016 02:54
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2019 02:58
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/30027
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-52
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 7 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar