Research Repository

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Fire Notification Signals in Sleeping Older Adults

Bruck, Dorothy and Thomas, Ian (2008) Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Fire Notification Signals in Sleeping Older Adults. Fire Technology, 44 (1). pp. 15-38. ISSN 1572-8099

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

No previous research has investigated the responsiveness of older adults (65–85 years) to different emergency fire signals during sleep. In this study the auditory arousal thresholds (AAT) of 45 older adults were compared across four signals; the high pitched T-3 (as in current US smoke alarms), a mixed frequency T-3 (500– 2500 Hz), a 500 Hz T-3 and a male voice. Participants were carefully screened, including for hearing, and awoken from deep sleep in a repeated measures design. Sounds increased progressively in volume until awakening occurred. It was found that the median AAT for the most effective signal, the mixed frequency T-3, was 20 dBA lower than the median AAT of the least effective signal, the current US high frequency smoke alarm signal. This finding is consistent with previous research, where the high pitched signal required a significantly louder volume than alternatives to wake sleepers of different ages, including children. Those aged over 75 years are especially at risk for sleeping through high pitched signals, probably due to the normal age-related decline in the ability to hear high pitched sounds. The minimum pillow volume of 75 dBA is inadequate for those over 75 years if a 3000 Hz notification signal is used. It is recommended that the high frequency signal currently found in smoke alarms be replaced by an alternative signal that performs significantly better in awakening most of the adult population, once the nature of the best signal has been determined.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID15611, sleep, older adults, smoke alarms, auditory arousal thresholds, human behavior in fire, fire notification
Subjects: Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Centre for Environmental Safety and Risk Engineering (CESARE)
FOR Classification > 0915 Interdisciplinary Engineering
SEO Classification > 8799 Other Construction
Depositing User: VUIR
Date Deposited: 18 Nov 2011 04:30
Last Modified: 25 Mar 2013 02:35
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/3537
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-007-0017-5
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 9 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar