Contextual influences on baseball ball-strike decisions in umpires, players, and controls
MacMahon, Clare and Starkes, J (2008) Contextual influences on baseball ball-strike decisions in umpires, players, and controls. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26 (7). pp. 751-760. ISSN 0264-0414Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.
Baseball umpires, players, and control participants with no baseball experience were asked to call balls and strikes for video clips. In a basic judgement task, umpires and players were significantly better at calling pitches than controls. In a direct information task, borderline pitches were presented following clips of definite balls and definite strikes. Participants called target pitches closer to the strike end of the scale when viewed after definite balls than when they followed definite strikes. Similarly, when borderline pitches were shown in different pitch counts, participants called pitches more towards the strike end of the scale when there were three balls in the count (3–0, 3–2). These findings indicate that the standard for evaluation changes based on the context in which stimuli are processed. Moreover, the strength of the contextual factors is illustrated in that the effects were shown in observers with and without experience in the task. Overall, however, umpires had a greater tendency to call strikes, indicating that they may use a norm of ‘‘hastening the game’’.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||ResPubID16469, expertise, decision making, baseball umpiring, sequential and contextual effects|
|Subjects:||FOR Classification > 1608 Sociology
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Centre for Ageing, Rehabilitation, Exercise & Sport Science (CARES)
|Date Deposited:||06 Sep 2011 02:28|
|Last Modified:||06 Sep 2011 02:28|
|ePrint Statistics:||View download statistics for this item|
|Citations in Scopus:||8 - View on Scopus|
Repository staff only