Research Repository

A systematic review of instruments for the analysis of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies

Klepac Pogrmilovic, Bojana ORCID: 0000-0002-9141-1862, O'sullivan, Grant ORCID: 0000-0003-1351-4273, Milton, K, Biddle, SJH and Pedisic, Zeljko ORCID: 0000-0003-2886-3556 (2019) A systematic review of instruments for the analysis of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17 (1). ISSN 1478-4505

[img]
Preview
Text
A systematic review of instruments for the analysis of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (889kB) | Preview

Abstract

© 2019 The Author(s). Background: This systematic review aimed to identify and critically assess available instruments for the analysis of national-level physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) policies and provide recommendations for their future use. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of academic and grey literature through six bibliographic databases, Google and the websites of three international organisations for PA promotion to identify instruments that are used or that may be used for national-level PA/SB policy analysis. In order to describe and categorise the identified instruments, we used the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity framework. This framework specifies the elements of a comprehensive analysis of PA/SB policies through the following categories: purpose, level, policy sector, type of policy, stages of policy cycle and scope of analysis. Results: Out of 22,071 screened items, 26 publications describing 16 instruments met the selection criteria. All the instruments can be used for analysing PA policy, whilst only two include questions about SB policy. None of the instruments allow for the analysis of all the relevant components of national PA/SB policy. Some important elements of PA policy analysis, such as the tourism and research sectors, the agenda-setting and endorsement/legitimisation stages, and the effects of policy, are addressed by only a few instruments. Moreover, none of the instruments address unwritten formal statements, informal policies, and the termination and succession stages of the policy cycle. Conclusion: Designing new instruments or adapting existing ones is needed to allow for a more thorough analysis of national PA and SB policies. Given that policy analysis covering all important components of PA/SB policy may be extremely time-consuming, a way forward might be to develop a set of complementary instruments, with each tool collecting detailed information about a specific component.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: physical activity, PA, sedentary behavior, SB, health,
Subjects: Current > FOR Classification > 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Current > FOR Classification > 1701 Psychology
Current > Division/Research > Institute for Health and Sport
Current > Division/Research > College of Health and Biomedicine
Current > Division/Research > College of Sports and Exercise Science
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 11 Sep 2020 04:10
Last Modified: 11 Sep 2020 04:10
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/41088
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0492-4
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar