Research Repository

Hull early walking aid for rehabilitation of transtibial amputees - randomized controlled trial (HEART)

Mazari, Fayyaz Ali Khan and Mockford, Katherine and Barnett, Cleveland T and Khan, Junaid A and Brown, Barbara and Smith, Lynne and Polman, Remco and Hancock, Amanda and Vanicek, Natalie K and Chetter, Ian C (2010) Hull early walking aid for rehabilitation of transtibial amputees - randomized controlled trial (HEART). Journal of Vascular Surgery, 6 (52). pp. 1564-1571. ISSN 0741-5214 (print) 1097-6809 (online)

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Abstract

Purpose To compare articulated and nonarticulated early walking aids (EWAs) for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in transtibial amputees. Methods Patients undergoing lower limb amputation in a tertiary-care vascular surgical unit were screened over a 4-year period. Recruited patients were randomized to receive articulated amputee mobility aid (AMA) or nonarticulated pneumatic postamputation mobility aid (PPAMA) during early rehabilitation. Primary (10-meter walking velocity) and secondary clinical (number and duration of physiotherapy treatments during EWA/prosthesis use) and quality-of-life (SF-36) outcome measures were recorded at five standardized assessment visits. Inter-group and intra-group analyses were performed. Results Two hundred seventy-two patients were screened and 29 transtibial amputees (median age, 56 years) were recruited (14/treatment arm). No significant difference was seen in demographics and comorbidities at baseline. Inter-group analysis: Median 10-meter walking velocity was significantly (Mann-Whitney, P = .020) faster in the PPAMA group (0.245 m/s, interquartile range [IQR] 0.218-0.402 m/s) compared with the AMA group (0.165 m/s; IQR, 0.118-0.265 m/s) at visit 1. However, there was no difference between the groups at any other visit. Similarly, the number of treatments using EWA was significantly (P = .045) lower in the PPAMA group (5.0; IQR, 3.5-8.0) compared with the AMA group (6.0; IQR, 6.0-10.5). No difference was observed between the groups in duration of physiotherapy or SF-36 domain and summary scores. Intra-group analysis: Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in 10-meter walking velocity (Friedman test; AMA P = .001; PPAMA P = .007); however, other clinical outcomes did not show any statistically significant improvement. Only physical function domain of SF-36 demonstrated significant improvement (Friedman test; AMA P = .037; PPAMA P = .029). Conclusions There is no difference in clinical and QOL outcomes between articulated and nonarticulated EWAs in rehabilitation of transtibial amputees.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID21064, ResPubID21944, walking aid, rehabilitation, transtibial amputees
Subjects: Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL)
FOR Classification > 1103 Clinical Sciences
SEO Classification > 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: VUIR
Date Deposited: 22 May 2012 00:26
Last Modified: 27 Jan 2015 05:28
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/7019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.006
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 1 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar