Research Repository

Kinematic comparison of the preferred and non-preferred foot punt kick

Ball, Kevin (2011) Kinematic comparison of the preferred and non-preferred foot punt kick. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29 (14). pp. 1545-1552. ISSN 0264-0414 (print) 1466-447X (online)

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.


Kicking with the non-preferred leg is important in Australian Football and becoming important in the rugby codes. The aim of this study was to examine differences between preferred and non-preferred leg kicking in the drop punt kick. Seventeen elite Australian Football players performed kicks with the preferred and non-preferred leg. Optotrak Certus collected kinematic data of the kick leg and pelvis (200 Hz) from kick leg toe-off until ball contact. Foot speed, knee and shank angular velocity at ball contact, and pelvis range of motion were significantly larger for the preferred leg (P < 0.05). In contrast, hip and thigh angular velocity at ball contact and hip range of motion were significantly larger for the non-preferred leg. This indicates different movement patterns, with preferred-leg kicks making greater use of the pelvis, knee, and shank while non-preferred leg kicks rely relatively more on the hip and thigh (P < 0.05). Reasons for this difference might be due to locking degrees of freedom or sub-optimal sequencing in the non-preferred leg. The thigh–knee continuum identified by Ball (2008) was also evident in this study. Findings have implications for training non-preferred leg kicking for performance and injury prevention.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ResPubID23502, Australian Football, drop punt, technique
Subjects: Current > FOR Classification > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science
Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Sport and Exercise Science
Historical > SEO Classification > 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
Depositing User: VUIR
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2012 04:59
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2020 02:25
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item
Citations in Scopus: 32 - View on Scopus

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar