Research Repository

Reliability and validity of selected pain provocation tests at the sacroiliac joint

Thompson, Joseph (2003) Reliability and validity of selected pain provocation tests at the sacroiliac joint. Coursework Master thesis, Victoria University.

[img] Text
Thompson_et.al_2003.pdf

Download (477kB)

Abstract

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a true source of pain commonly tested in osteopathic practice. This study investigated the inter examiner reliability and validity of pain provocation tests at the SIJ. Two examiners tested fifty participants, mean age 23. Sixteen participants were symptomatic for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Examiners were blinded to participants inclusion criteria and examinations findings. Cohen's kappa and percentage agreement were used to evaluate inter examiner reliability. Validity was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Percentage agreement between examiners was 76% and Cohen's kappa findings included a kappa = 0.475 overall. Total validity findings included; sensitivity 0.34, specificity 0.93, positive predictive value 0.70 and negative predictive value 0.75. Investigation identified a poor level of validity of pain provocation tests at the SIJ and of inter examiner agreement using compression and gapping tests. A good level of inter examiner agreement occurred using the high thrust and Faber test (k=0.674 0.611 respectively). This minor thesis was written by a post-graduate student as part of the requirements of the Master of Health Science (Osteopathy) program.

Item Type: Thesis (Coursework Master thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Osteopathy Masters Project, sacroiliac joint, diagnostic test, pain, reliability, validity, osteopathic practice
Subjects: RFCD Classification > 320000 Medical and Health Sciences
Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
Depositing User: Tracey Prelec
Date Deposited: 04 Sep 2008 22:50
Last Modified: 23 May 2013 16:39
URI: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/932
ePrint Statistics: View download statistics for this item

Repository staff only

View Item View Item

Search Google Scholar