Effect of different pacing strategies on 4-km cycling time trial performance
Vieira-Cavalcante, Victor ORCID: 0000-0002-3878-9401 (external link), Venancio-Dallan, Leticia
ORCID: 0000-0003-1639-1037 (external link), Pereira-Santana, Ottavio
ORCID: 0000-0003-2282-6383 (external link), Bertuzzi, Rômulo
ORCID: 0000-0002-0407-9620 (external link), Tomazini, Fabiano
ORCID: 0000-0001-6002-8134 (external link), Bishop, David
ORCID: 0000-0002-6956-9188 (external link), Cristina-Souza, Gislaine
ORCID: 0000-0001-7770-4514 (external link) and Lima-Silva, Adriano E
ORCID: 0000-0002-0613-5104 (external link)
(2022)
Effect of different pacing strategies on 4-km cycling time trial performance.
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 55.
ISSN 0100-879X
Abstract
In cycling, there is a body of evidence that supports that an all-out start strategy is superior to an even-pacing strategy, but it is unknown whether an all-out start strategy is superior to a self-paced strategy. In the present study, we investigated the effects of three different pacing strategies on 4-km cycling time trial performance. After preliminary trials (familiarization trials and a baseline 4-km cycling time trial), in a randomized and counterbalanced order, twelve male cyclists (32.3±7.2 years old, maximum rate of O2 uptake (.VO2 peak) 4.3±0.4 L/min) completed: 1) a self-paced 4-km cycling time trial; 2) an all-out start (B10 s), followed by maintenance of the average baseline trial power for the first km and self-paced cycling for the remaining trial (all-out+mean); and 3) an all-out start (B10 s), followed by a power 5% above the average baseline trial power for the first km and self-paced cycling for the remaining trial (all-out+5%mean). Although there was a significant interaction between power and distance (P=0.1) with different power distribution profiles throughout the trial, there was no significant difference (P=0.99) between the three strategies for overall exercise performance (self-paced 379.8±13.9 s, all-out+mean 380.0±16.0 s, and all-out+5%mean 380.2±11.5 s). Oxygen uptake, rating of perceived effort, and heart rate were also similar across the pacing strategies. Different all-out start strategies did not confer additional benefits to performance compared to a self-paced strategy.
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/46393 |
DOI | 10.1590/1414-431X2022e12351 (external link) |
Official URL | https://www.scielo.br/j/bjmbr/a/6b5mfhJnqJKqyxdgtx... (external link) |
Subjects | Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 4207 Sports science and exercise Current > Division/Research > Institute for Health and Sport |
Keywords | cycling, pacing, pacing strategies, power and distance, power distrbution |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |