Socioeconomic inequalities in physical function decline: multilevel longitudinal results from the HABITAT study

[thumbnail of s12889-025-23309-8.pdf]
Preview
s12889-025-23309-8.pdf - Published Version (1MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Rachele, Jerome ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-4010, Loh, Venurs ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1821-1087, Timperio, Anna ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-5012, Veitch, Jenny ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8962-0887, Thomas, Rees ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-6472, Reid, Rebecca A and Brown, Wendy J ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-4509 (2025) Socioeconomic inequalities in physical function decline: multilevel longitudinal results from the HABITAT study. BMC Public Health, 25 (1). p. 2378. ISSN 1471-2458 (In Press)

Abstract

Background: Australia’s population is ageing, with a projected continued increase in the proportion of individuals aged 65 years and older. Good physical function is important to ensure independence and mobility among older adults. This study examined changes in physical function by socioeconomic indicators including education, occupation, household income and neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Methods: Data were from waves four (2013) and five (2016) (1,186 men and 1,673 women) of the HABITAT study, a multilevel longitudinal study of adults aged 40–65 at baseline (2007) living in 200 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. Individual-level socioeconomic indicators were self-reported and physical function was self-reported using the 10-item subscale of the Short-Form 36 survey, with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was obtained from a census-based Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage score. Data were analysed using multilevel linear regression. Results: Pooled analysis showed graded inequalities in physical function across all socioeconomic groups: those with lower levels of education, occupation and household income all had lower function, while residents of the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods had 8.16 lower function (95%CI: 10.21, 6.12) than those in the most advantaged neighbourhoods. Over the three-year period, there was a mean reduction in physical function scores of 1.97 (95%CI: -2.58, -1.36), though physical function inequalities did not widen over time between socioeconomic groups. Conclusion: There was little evidence of inequalities in the magnitude of decline in physical function across socioeconomic groups between the two time points. Future research should consider more objective performance-based measures to better understand the complexity of physical function among the ageing population.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/49538
DOI 10.1186/s12889-025-23309-8
Official URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23309-8
Subjects Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 4206 Public health
Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 4207 Sports science and exercise
Current > Division/Research > Institute for Health and Sport
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login