Response to W. Brown
Bishop, David ORCID: 0000-0002-6956-9188 (2006) Response to W. Brown. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9 (1-2). pp. 38-39. ISSN 1440-2440
Abstract
In September 2005, I was invited to write an editorial regarding the inclusion of AAESS Accredited Exercise Physiologists in the Medicare Plus Scheme.1 Around this idea, I chose to raise a few issues regarding the blurring of the distinction between physical activity promotion and exercise prescription. I also argued the need for trained exercise professionals (including exercise physiologists) to deliver prescribed exercise to certain populations. I believe that this is an important debate and I thank Prof. Brown for her response.2 I would, however, like to clarify my position on a few points.
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
Additional Information | Online ISSN: 1878-1861 |
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/8085 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.010 |
Official URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.010 |
Subjects | Historical > FOR Classification > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science Historical > FOR Classification > 1605 Policy and Administration Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL) |
Keywords | ResPubID22131. physiology, AAESS, Accredited Exercise Physiologists, Medicare Plus, exercise professionals, physical activity promotion, exercise prescription, prescribed exercise, Australia, Australian |
Citations in Scopus | 0 - View on Scopus |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |