The Constitution of Modernity: A Critique of Castoriadis
Smith, Karl E (2009) The Constitution of Modernity: A Critique of Castoriadis. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (4). pp. 505-521. ISSN 1368-4310 (print) 1461-7137 (online)
Abstract
Every theory of modernity must at least presuppose an implicit ontology of the social-historical. Castoriadis is one of the few who makes these presuppositions explicit. Castoriadis’s socio-cultural ontology reveals that the essentially indeterminate nature of the social-historical entails ontological plurality, in the face of which monological or unilinear theories of modernity collapse — leaving us with a fragmented field of tensions. Castoriadis’s exposition of the ontological plurality of the social-historical is one of his most important contributions to social theory — but when he turns his attention to modernity, he immediately polarizes the field. The aim here is to offer some correctives to Castoriadis’s polarized depiction, primarily by teasing out tensions in his work.
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/8869 |
DOI | 10.1177/1368431009345048 |
Official URL | http://est.sagepub.com/content/12/4/505 |
Subjects | Historical > FOR Classification > 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Social Sciences and Psychology |
Keywords | ResPubID23000, autonomy, Castoriadis, culture, modernity, social ontology |
Citations in Scopus | 7 - View on Scopus |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |