The Constitution of Modernity: A Critique of Castoriadis

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Smith, Karl E (2009) The Constitution of Modernity: A Critique of Castoriadis. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (4). pp. 505-521. ISSN 1368-4310 (print) 1461-7137 (online)

Abstract

Every theory of modernity must at least presuppose an implicit ontology of the social-historical. Castoriadis is one of the few who makes these presuppositions explicit. Castoriadis’s socio-cultural ontology reveals that the essentially indeterminate nature of the social-historical entails ontological plurality, in the face of which monological or unilinear theories of modernity collapse — leaving us with a fragmented field of tensions. Castoriadis’s exposition of the ontological plurality of the social-historical is one of his most important contributions to social theory — but when he turns his attention to modernity, he immediately polarizes the field. The aim here is to offer some correctives to Castoriadis’s polarized depiction, primarily by teasing out tensions in his work.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/8869
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009345048
Official URL http://est.sagepub.com/content/12/4/505
Subjects Historical > FOR Classification > 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields
Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Social Sciences and Psychology
Keywords ResPubID23000, autonomy, Castoriadis, culture, modernity, social ontology
Citations in Scopus 6 - View on Scopus
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login