An Innovation in the Wine Closure Industry: Screw Caps Threaten the Dominance of Cork

180 638 206 3 1525 document 206 wp18_2002_mortensen_marks.pdf application/pdf 75665 2011-09-09 10:19:53 https://vuir.vu.edu.au/180/1/wp18_2002_mortensen_marks.pdf 180 1 application/pdf text en public

wp18_2002_mortensen_marks.pdf

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/10875 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/10875 http://eprints.org/relation/hasIndexCodesVersion https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/10875 10875 3 1735000 document 10875 indexcodes.txt text/plain c91dffc01f32ff362e31c8f8266fb0c6 MD5 12638 2013-02-06 18:05:29 https://vuir.vu.edu.au/180/2/indexcodes.txt 180 2 2 text/plain other Generate index codes conversion from application/pdf to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/206 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/206 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/document/206 archive 34 disk0/00/00/01/80 2007-06-04 2021-08-27 07:38:51 2008-08-19 19:10:38 monograph show Mortensen Wayne Mortensen, Wayne Marks Brian Marks, Brian An Innovation in the Wine Closure Industry: Screw Caps Threaten the Dominance of Cork pub 350000 FOR_2008_150500 Management wine closure industry; screw caps; cork Cork stoppers became the industry standard for wine bottle seals probably going as far back as the 1600s. Manufacturers of alternative wine bottle seals have made several attempts to wrest market away from cork manufacturers, particularly over the last thirty years. In spite of these efforts, cork remains the dominant wine bottle seal, with a market share of around 90 per cent. This paper examines the threat to cork manufacturers of one innovative product, the screw or twist top wine seal. Developed in the late 1950s and thoroughly piloted and tested in the market in Australia in the 1970s, the screw top seal was largely a failure, despite the commitment of a group of Australian winemakers to what they believed was a technically superior product. While Australian wine makers abandoned the screw top experiment in the early 1980s, a second attempt by a small number of wine makers from the mid 1990s has captured the attention of the wine industry internationally due to its initial success. What unfolds in this paper is a fascinating story of a product that on many performance attributes outperforms the cork seal, but has so far failed to gain mainstream market acceptance from retailers and end consumers. Although there have been scores of articles in wine and food magazines that have discussed the merits of cork versus alternative seals, we are not aware of any literature that has evaluated the contest through the lenses of innovation theory. In so doing this paper analyses why the initial product launch of the screw top was unsuccessful and why the recent second attempt may indeed be a turning point for the screw top wine bottle seal. The paper is divided into five sections. Section one provides a brief overview of the nature and history of cork as a wine seal. The growing dissatisfaction with cork as a wine seal is outlined in section two. Section three provides the background to the development of the screw top wine seal and its launch in Australia. In section four we explore with the aid of technology adoption innovation theory why the launch was a failure. We then outline in section five the second recent attempt by Australian wine makers to gain market acceptance for the screw top. We will see in this section there are a number of factors that have changed between the first launch and the second launch. Section six focuses on the question as to whether the second attack on the industry standard will be successful. We conclude that innovation theory can both explain why the first launch failed and why the second launch may indeed be successful in the long run. In particular, Moore's (2001) adaptation of the technology adoption life cycle model, although originally developed from experience in hi-tech industries, aided in understanding the key reasons for the initial failure of the screw cap and also in predicting the early success of the screw cap's second attack. 2002 published Victoria University 18 public working_paper Melbourne, Australia 14 Victoria University School of Management FALSE 2013-06-05 16:38:16