The interest of the World Bank, various agencies of the United Nations and other donor organisations,
which in the past supported information and communication technology for development (ICT4D)
initiatives under the broad telecentre umbrella, seems to be waning somewhat. There are several reasons
for this lack of interest. With the increasing ubiquity of mobile services, those who considered telecentres
useful, mainly because of the connectivity they provided, may no longer see a need for them. Many
initiatives were considered failures, as they were not financially sustainable beyond the initial funding
period. There was also a lack of adequate evaluations to show whether and how these centres had
contributed to development objectives. While there are several evaluations of shared facilities, there is
no generally recognised framework for such appraisals, which exhibit various approaches, derived from
different disciplines, mainly from information systems and to a more limited extent from development
studies. Approaching an evaluation of an ICT4D project in a rural setting in Bangladesh from a
development perspective, this study, which is informed by the seminal work of Amartya Sen (2001),
“Development as Freedom” (DaF), adopts an interpretive qualitative research style and illustrates the
importance of understanding the local context. Our findings demonstrate that the two ICT interventions
studied in this research had significant impacts on the five freedoms espoused in DaF.