The disciplines of town planning and public health have investigated the connection between walking and
neighbourhood form (e.g., Frank et al. 2003; Frumkin et al., 2004). In particular, Terri Pikora and her
colleagues (2003) created a schema to classify a range of potential elements that may influence an adult’s
decision to walk. By reviewing the health, urban planning and transport-related literature, they created a
socio-ecological framework to classify a range of potential elements that may influence an adult’s decision to
walk. This framework identifies four dimensions of neighbourhood form related to walking: functionality,
safety, destinations and aesthetics. Functionality relates to the efficiency of movement provided by the layout
of the streets and footpaths for its pedestrian users. Safety relates to those features that affect personal
safety and traffic safety. Destinations relate to the availability and accessibility of neighbourhood facilities.
Aesthetics describe the features that create “interesting and pleasing physical environments” (Pikora et al.,
2003, p. 1696). Collectively, these four dimensions “collate all potentially relevant factors” (ibid, p. 1697) and
provide a framework that could be applied to school travel research to assist in the understanding of the
physical factors that affect walking. The applicability of these dimensions have been tested in studies and
have been found to affect the likelihood of adults walking for transport or recreation (e.g., Hoehner et al.,
2005; Pikora et al., 2006; Badland et al., 2009). These four dimensions, however, have yet to be applied to
children’s school travels on foot.