Comparing probability and non-probability sampling methods in ecstasy research: Implications for the Internet as a research tool

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Miller, Peter G, Johnston, Jennifer, Dunn, Matthew, Fry, Craig L and Degenhardt, Louisa (2010) Comparing probability and non-probability sampling methods in ecstasy research: Implications for the Internet as a research tool. Substance Use and Misuse, 45 (3). pp. 437-450. ISSN 1082-6084

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/10514
DOI https://doi.org/10.3109/10826080903452470
Subjects Historical > FOR Classification > 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Historical > FOR Classification > 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Centre for Cultural Diversity and Wellbeing
Keywords ResPubID25165, illicit drugs, party drugs
Citations in Scopus 18 - View on Scopus
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login