Comparing probability and non-probability sampling methods in ecstasy research: Implications for the Internet as a research tool
Download
Download
Download
Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.
Export
Miller, Peter G, Johnston, Jennifer, Dunn, Matthew, Fry, Craig L and Degenhardt, Louisa (2010) Comparing probability and non-probability sampling methods in ecstasy research: Implications for the Internet as a research tool. Substance Use and Misuse, 45 (3). pp. 437-450. ISSN 1082-6084
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
| Item type | Article |
| URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/10514 |
| DOI | 10.3109/10826080903452470 |
| Subjects | Historical > FOR Classification > 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences Historical > FOR Classification > 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > Centre for Cultural Diversity and Wellbeing |
| Keywords | ResPubID25165, illicit drugs, party drugs |
| Citations in Scopus | 21 - View on Scopus |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)