The No 'Ought' from 'Is' Argument: Faulty thinking in Ethics and Social Science

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Doughney, James (2006) The No 'Ought' from 'Is' Argument: Faulty thinking in Ethics and Social Science. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 1 (3). pp. 27-40. ISSN 1833-4318

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/2939
Subjects Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Economics and Finance
Historical > FOR Classification > 2299 Other Philosophy and Religious Studies
Keywords ResPubID11496, ethics, argument, moral realism, ought, no ought
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login