The No 'Ought' from 'Is' Argument: Faulty thinking in Ethics and Social Science
Download
Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.
Export
Doughney, James (2006) The No 'Ought' from 'Is' Argument: Faulty thinking in Ethics and Social Science. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 1 (3). pp. 27-40. ISSN 1833-4318
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/2939 |
Subjects | Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Economics and Finance Historical > FOR Classification > 2299 Other Philosophy and Religious Studies |
Keywords | ResPubID11496, ethics, argument, moral realism, ought, no ought |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)