Rationalities that underpin employability provision in higher education across eight countries

[thumbnail of s10734-022-00957-y.pdf]
s10734-022-00957-y.pdf - Published Version (686kB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Hooley, TJ, Bennett, D and Knight, Elizabeth ORCID: 0000-0001-6596-6525 (2022) Rationalities that underpin employability provision in higher education across eight countries. Higher Education. ISSN 0018-1560


This article explores the rationalities advanced by 18 higher education institutions, located across eight countries, for developing and delivering employability provision. The article uses Sultana’s Habermasian-derived framework to categorise rationalities as either technocratic, humanistic or emancipatory. Based on a series of semi-structured dialogic interviews, the article explores how key strategic and operational personnel within higher education institutions articulate their rationality for engaging with employability. It finds that the rationalities advanced to support employability within different institutions vary through a conversation between institutional culture and priorities and the demands of different stakeholders who the institution seeks to engage. The technocratic and humanistic rationalities dominate, with the emancipatory rationality weakly represented in the data. However, in many cases, the different rationalities are woven together, often for tactical reasons, to create bespoke institutional rationalities.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/46294
DOI 10.1007/s10734-022-00957-y
Official URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-0...
Subjects Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 3902 Education policy, sociology and philosophy
Current > Division/Research > Mitchell Institute
Keywords higher education, qualitative data, employability, ideology
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login