Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study

[thumbnail of s12874-022-01690-x.pdf]
s12874-022-01690-x.pdf - Published Version (1MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Van Dyke, Nina ORCID: 0000-0002-8872-3451, Drinkwater, Eric ORCID: 0000-0002-9594-9360 and Rachele, Jerome ORCID: 0000-0002-5101-4010 (2022) Improving the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in surveys: an experimental study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22. ISSN 1471-2288


Background: Many studies rely on self-reported height and weight. While a substantial body of literature exists on misreporting of height and weight, little exists on improving accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine, using an experimental design and a comparative approach, whether the accuracy of self-reported height and weight data can be increased by improving how these questions are asked in surveys, drawing on the relevant evidence from the psychology and survey research literatures. Methods: Two surveys from two separate studies were used to test our hypotheses (Science Survey, n = 1,200; Eating Behaviours Survey, n = 200). Participants were randomly assigned to one of six conditions, four of which were designed to improve the accuracy of the self-reported height and weight data (“preamble”), and two of which served as the control conditions (“no preamble”). Four hypotheses were tested: (H1) survey participants read a preamble prior to being asked their height and weight will report lower heights and higher weights than those not read a preamble; (H2) the impact of question-wording (i.e., preamble vs. no preamble) on self-reported weight will be greater for participants with higher BMIs; (H3) the impact of question-wording on height will be greater for older participants; (H4) either version of the weight question – standard or “weight-specific”—may result in participants reporting more accurate self-reported weight. One-way MANOVA was conducted to test Hypothesis 1; two-way analysis of variance were conducted to test Hypothesis 2; moderation analysis was used to test Hypothesis 3; independent samples t-test was conducted to test Hypothesis 4. Results: None of the hypotheses was supported. Conclusions: This paper provides an important starting point from which to inform further work exploring how question wording can improve self-reported measurement of height and weight. Future research should explore how question preambles may or may not operationalise hypothesised underlying mechanisms, the sensitivity or intrusiveness of height and weight questions, individual beliefs about one’s height and weight, and survey context.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01690-x
Official URL
Subjects Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 4206 Public health
Current > Division/Research > Institute for Health and Sport
Current > Division/Research > Mitchell Institute
Keywords self reporting, height and weight, data accuracy, surveys
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login