Carbon Reduction in the Post-Kyoto era. Have we progressed? A comparison
Zeller, Bruno and Longo, Michael (2012) Carbon Reduction in the Post-Kyoto era. Have we progressed? A comparison. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 1 (1). pp. 7-37. ISSN 2211-906X
Abstract
In a fragmented global environment, the efforts of state and non-state actors are important in assessing the state of play on climate change mitigation actions around the world. This article will consider from a comparative perspective the various legislative models for addressing climate change and the reduction of GHG emissions with particular focus on the EU, USA, Australia and Switzerland. As legal developments are not limited to legislative schemes, this article will examine the voluntary carbon offset market and other trade related solutions to GHG emissions which have emerged in the absence of mandatory limitation systems. Also warranting attention are the actions of private parties in common law jurisdictions to bring legal proceedings against power companies for damage caused by climate change. Together, these developments demonstrate that climate change abatement is not the sole remit of the legislature.
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/10620 |
DOI | 10.1163/2211906X-00101001 |
Official URL | http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/10... |
Subjects | Historical > FOR Classification > 0501 Ecological Applications Historical > FOR Classification > 1801 Law Current > Division/Research > College of Law and Justice |
Keywords | ResPubID25984, climate change, carbon reduction, legislative scheme, non-legislative scheme, comparison, greenhouse gas emissions, GHG emissions, Kyoto Protocol, carbon offset market |
Citations in Scopus | 0 - View on Scopus |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |