The 'Public Accountability Approach': Suggestions for a Framework to Characterise, Compare, Inform and Evaluate Gambling Regulation
Borrell, Jennifer (2008) The 'Public Accountability Approach': Suggestions for a Framework to Characterise, Compare, Inform and Evaluate Gambling Regulation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6 (2). pp. 265-281. ISSN 1557-1874
Abstract
It is argued that the analytical comparison of gambling regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions requires the identification of salient dimensions to provide the basis for such. It is further suggested that governmental ‘conflict of interest’ might provide a useful dimension for such comparison, as operationalised by concomitant EGM harm and government dependence criteria. The same ‘conflict of interest’ criteria are then suggested as a guide for gambling regulation within single jurisdictions, this being named the ‘Public Accountability Approach.’ These points are discussed within broader reference to lines and webs of harm production within a public health analysis. Broader reference is also made to the proper role of government within contemporary democracy.
Dimensions Badge
Altmetric Badge
Item type | Article |
URI | https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/3527 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11469-007-9131-3 |
Official URL | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11469-... |
Subjects | Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Economics and Finance Historical > FOR Classification > 1117 Public Health and Health Services |
Keywords | ResPubID16525, gambling regulation, EGM, conflict of interest, public health, precautionary principle, accountability |
Citations in Scopus | 10 - View on Scopus |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |