Supported decision-making and the achievement of non-discrimination: the promise and paradox of the Disabilities Convention

Full text for this resource is not available from the Research Repository.

Weller, Penny (2008) Supported decision-making and the achievement of non-discrimination: the promise and paradox of the Disabilities Convention. Law in Context, 26 (2). pp. 85-110. ISSN 0811-5796

Abstract

This article argues that the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has the potential to limit involuntary medical treatment through requiring the development of genuine processes of supported decision-making in health care. It argues that the emphasis on nondiscrimination in the CRPD envisages supported decision-making processes in health as central to the effective operation of non-discriminatory environments and the achievement of full social participation. Advance directives are posited as a practical method of formalising consumer participation in medical decisions in ways that take account of varying mental health conditions and the specific institutional contexts in which mental health treatment is provided.

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/4038
Official URL http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=5...
Subjects Historical > Faculty/School/Research Centre/Department > School of Law
Historical > FOR Classification > 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Keywords ResPubID16590. mental disabilities, mental deficiencies, mental health, mental health treatment, mental health laws, treatment, human rights, civil rights, rights of the disabled, mentally ill, discrimination, non-discrimination, anti-discrimination, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, involuntary medical treatment, involuntary medical care, decision-making in health care, decision-making in medical care, consumer participation, medical decisions, doctors and patients
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login