Classifying Australian building practitioners' behaviour in beyond-compliance in residential energy efficiency

[thumbnail of bepam-01-2025-0019en.pdf]
Preview
bepam-01-2025-0019en.pdf - Published Version (1MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Lu, Yi ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-1489, Karunasena, Gayani Inoka ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3906 and Liu, Chunlu ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-4355 (2026) Classifying Australian building practitioners' behaviour in beyond-compliance in residential energy efficiency. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. pp. 1-17. ISSN 2044-124X (In Press)

Abstract

Purpose – Achieving beyond-compliance in residential energy efficiency remains a persistent challenge in Australia, with only few building practitioners consistently doing so, undermining Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) progress. Despite varying beyond-compliance behaviour states in the compliance process, no study has classified them by integrating both intention and actual beyond-compliance outcomes. The study aims to classify Australian building practitioners’ beyond-compliance behaviours, identifying differentiations in the underlying motivations and abilities that influence beyond-compliance decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The study draws on survey responses from 73 residential building practitioners in Victoria (Australia), all of whom were actively involved in the design stage of projects. Frequency analysis was used to generate classification. Findings – Australian building practitioners’ beyond-compliance behaviours are classified into three states: State 1: not intended to achieve beyond-compliance (47%). State 2: intended but not always successful in achieving beyond-compliance (16%). State 3: intended and successful in achieving beyond-compliance (37%). In examining behaviour state’s association with building practitioners’ occupational characteristics, most builders and construction supervisors, as well as experienced building practitioners belong to State 3. Originality/value – This study is the first to classify building practitioners’ beyond-compliance behaviours considering both intention and actual outcomes. It highlights the diverse challenges and motivations influencing practitioners’ actions. It provides a foundation for targeted interventions, empowering more practitioners to go beyond-compliance and supporting SDG progress

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/49915
DOI 10.1108/bepam-01-2025-0019
Official URL https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-01-2025-0019
Subjects Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 3302 Building
Current > Division/Research > Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login