Emphasis on various subtopics in the anatomy curriculum for chiropractic training: An international survey of chiropractors and anatomists

Chapman, Peter D, Meyer, Amanda ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-6040, Young, Kenneth J ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-7977, Wibowo, Daniel and Walker, Bruce ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8506-6740 (2015) Emphasis on various subtopics in the anatomy curriculum for chiropractic training: An international survey of chiropractors and anatomists. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 29 (1). pp. 37-42. ISSN 1042-5055

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to conduct an international survey of the perceived optimal level of anatomy teaching from anatomy academics and practicing chiropractors. We hypothesized that the optimum level of anatomical understanding for chiropractic students does not differ between the anatomists teaching the students and practicing chiropractors. Methods The opinion of anatomists teaching in a chiropractic course (n = 16) was compared to practicing chiropractors (n = 589). The students' level of understanding was based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy for 16 different curriculum areas. Anatomists were recruited by contacting the accredited chiropractic courses worldwide. Snowball sampling was used for the practicing chiropractors. Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the results of anatomists and chiropractors. Results Opinions differed between anatomists and chiropractors on 9 out of the 16 questions. Where opinions differed, chiropractors recommended a higher standard of anatomical knowledge. The level suggested by chiropractors for these curriculum areas is equal to the "evaluating" level where chiropractic students can remember, understand, apply, and analyze anatomical knowledge to be able to justify a clinical decision. Conclusion Compared to anatomists working in chiropractic programs, chiropractors suggest a higher standard of anatomy be taught to undergraduates. Collaboration between chiropractors and anatomists would likely be beneficial in creating or modifying anatomy curricula for chiropractic students.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/50241
DOI 10.7899/JCE-14-10
Official URL https://doi.org/10.7899/jce-14-10
Subjects Current > Division/Research > College of Health and Biomedicine
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login