Digital twins and the terminology of “personalization” or “personalized learning” in educational policy: a discussion paper

Arantes, Janine ORCID: 0000-0002-0301-5780 (2023) Digital twins and the terminology of “personalization” or “personalized learning” in educational policy: a discussion paper. Policy Futures in Education. pp. 1-14. ISSN 1478-2103

Abstract

There has been a policy push in K-12 educational settings towards personalized learning in the last decade. Commercial platforms and learning designers have responded, offering learning tools to support teaching and learning through data-driven insights and recommendations. Trending towards the augmentation or replacing human teachers with non-human technology, this paper argues that personalized learning with human teachers is an entirely different process from personalization with digital twins. Drawing on new materialist thinking, it explores the impacts and implications for discourse concerning teacher quality and disadvantages within educational systems. It clarifies the conflation of the terms “personalized learning” and “personalization” to illuminate the power, positionality, and privilege enabled for some, in conflating terms in Australian educational policy.

Dimensions Badge

Altmetric Badge

Item type Article
URI https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/46599
DOI 10.1177/14782103231176357
Official URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147821032...
Subjects Current > FOR (2020) Classification > 3904 Specialist studies in education
Current > Division/Research > College of Arts and Education
Keywords K-12 education, personalised learning, human led, technology led
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Search Google Scholar

Repository staff login